Comparison of linear spring and nonlinear FEM methods in dynamic coupled analysis of floating structure and mooring system
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Byoung Wan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sung, Hong Gun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jin Ha | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hong, Sa Young | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-03T04:47:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-03T04:47:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-10 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0889-9746 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1095-8622 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.kriso.re.kr/sciwatch/handle/2021.sw.kriso/931 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper compares the dynamic coupled behavior of floating structure and mooring system in time domain using two numerical methods for the mooring lines such as the linear spring method and the nonlinear FEM (Finite Element Method). In the linear spring method, hydrodynamic coefficients and forces on the floating body are calculated using BEM (Boundary Element Method) and the time domain equation is derived using convolution. The coupled solution is obtained by simply adding the pre-determined spring constants of the mooring lines into the floating body equation. In FEM, the minimum energy principle is applied to formulate the nonlinear dynamic equation of the mooring system with a discrete numerical model. The ground contact model and Morison formula for drag forces are also included in the formulation. The coupled solution is obtained by iteratively solving the floating body equation and the FEM equation of the mooring system. Two example structures such as weathervane ship and semi-submersible structure are analyzed using linear spring and nonlinear FEM methods and the difference of those two methods are presented. By analyzing the cases with or without surge-pitch or sway-roll coupling stiffness of mooring lines in the linear spring method, the effect of coupling stiffness of the mooring system is also discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.format.extent | 23 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD | - |
dc.title | Comparison of linear spring and nonlinear FEM methods in dynamic coupled analysis of floating structure and mooring system | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 영국 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.07.002 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84885322372 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000326902100013 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, v.42, pp 205 - 227 | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES | - |
dc.citation.volume | 42 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 205 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 227 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | sci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Mechanics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Mechanical | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Mechanics | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Floating structure | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Mooring line | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Coupled analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Spring method | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | FEM | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Coupled stiffness | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(34103) 대전광역시 유성구 유성대로1312번길 32042-866-3114
COPYRIGHT 2021 BY KOREA RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SHIPS & OCEAN ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.