The performance comparison of the OTEC cycles with an ejector
- Authors
- Moon, J.H.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, H.J.; Yoon, J.I.
- Issue Date
- 2016
- Publisher
- CRC Press/Balkema
- Citation
- Progress in Renewable Energies Offshore - Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Renewable Energies Offshore, RENEW 2016, pp 481 - 486
- Pages
- 6
- Journal Title
- Progress in Renewable Energies Offshore - Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Renewable Energies Offshore, RENEW 2016
- Start Page
- 481
- End Page
- 486
- URI
- https://www.kriso.re.kr/sciwatch/handle/2021.sw.kriso/8568
- DOI
- 10.1201/9781315229256-58
- ISSN
- 0000-0000
- Abstract
- To address the low efficiency of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC), cycles with applied ejectors were studied. The high-pressure working fluid from the motive part of an ejector passing the suction part lets in low-pressure fluid and the combined fluid comes out of the discharge part, lowering the pressure of the suction part. The pressure difference between the inlet and outlet of the turbine becomes bigger than a basic cycle, which leads to higher efficiency under the same flow rate. The performances of three OTEC cycles with applied ejectors were analyzed and compared in this study. The cycles that were used for analysis were a vapor-vapor ejector cycle with an R32 refrigerant, a liquid-vapor ejector cycle with an R32/R152a mixed refrigerant, and a liquid-vapor ejector cycle with an R152a refrigerant using a motive pump. The temperature of the heat source was 26°C, and that of the heat sink was 5°C. For 20 kW power generation, the performances of each system, such as the flow rate and efficiency, were compared and studied. ? 2016 Taylor & Francis Group, London.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 친환경해양개발연구본부 > 해수에너지연구센터 > Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.