Coupled versus decoupled analysis for floating body and mooring lines
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, B.W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sung, H.G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hong, S.Y. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-22T08:30:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-22T08:30:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1098-6189 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.kriso.re.kr/sciwatch/handle/2021.sw.kriso/8487 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Coupled analysis is common in time domain analysis of a floating body with mooring lines. But, the coupled method may be time consuming because numerical model for both body and lines is usually big. If the body and lines are solved separately, the model may be simpler. For example, the body motion is solved in advance with spring model for mooring lines. Then, fairlead motion due to body motion is imposed to the lines to solve line dynamics. The decoupled method is simpler and faster. However, the result may be approximate. This paper compared computing time and accuracy of the coupled and decoupled methods in time domain analysis of moored body. A barge ship with twelve spread catenary mooring lines was analyzed as a numerical example. HOBEM (Higher Order Boundary Element Method) and FEM (Finite Element Method) were applied to formulating ship and line equations, respectively. The equations were solved by coupled and decoupled analyses and the ship motions such as surge, sway, heave, roll, pitch and yaw were compared for the two methods. Mooring line tensions and cpu time were also compared. Copyright ? 2017 by the International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE). | - |
dc.format.extent | 7 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | Society of Petroleum Engineers | - |
dc.title | Coupled versus decoupled analysis for floating body and mooring lines | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85038887525 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, pp 940 - 946 | - |
dc.citation.title | Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 940 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 946 | - |
dc.type.docType | Conference Paper | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Boundary element method | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Finite element method | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Mooring | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Mooring cables | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Numerical methods | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Sailing vessels | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Ships | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Coupled analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Coupled and decoupled analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Decoupled analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FEM (finite element method) | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Floating bodies | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Higher-order boundary element methods | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Mooring line | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Mooring line tensions | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Time domain analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Coupled analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Decoupled analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Floating body | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Mooring line | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(34103) 대전광역시 유성구 유성대로1312번길 32042-866-3114
COPYRIGHT 2021 BY KOREA RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SHIPS & OCEAN ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.