Comparison of simplified model and FEM model in coupled analysis of floating wind turbine
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김병완 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 홍사영 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 성홍근 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 홍석원 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-22T08:00:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-22T08:00:29Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-09-01 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.kriso.re.kr/sciwatch/handle/2021.sw.kriso/8151 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper compares simplified and finite element method (FEM) models for tower and blade in dynamic coupled analysis of floating wind turbine. A SPAR type wind turbine with catenary mooring lines is considered in numerical analysis. Floating body equation is derived using boundary element method (BEM) and convolution. Equations for mooring line, tower and blade are formulated with theories of catenary, elastic beam and aerodynamic rotating beam, respectively and FEM is applied in the formulation. By combining the equations, coupled solutions are calculated. Tower or blade may be assumed rigid or lumped body for simplicity in modeling. By comparing floating body motions, mooring line tensions and tower stresses with the simple model and original FEM model, the effect of including or neglecting elastic, rotating and aerodynamic behavior of tower and blade is discussed.ng body equation is derived using boundary element method (BEM) and convolution. Equations for mooring line, tower and blade are formulated with theories of catenary, elastic beam and aerodynamic rotating beam, respectively and FEM is applied in the formulation. By combining the equations, coupled solutions are calculated. Tower or blade may be assumed rigid or lumped body for simplicity in modeling. By comparing floating body motions, mooring line tensions and tower stresses with the simple model and original FEM model, the effect of including or neglecting elastic, rotating and aerodynamic behavior of tower and blade is discussed. | - |
dc.format.extent | 23 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | Techno Press | - |
dc.title | Comparison of simplified model and FEM model in coupled analysis of floating wind turbine | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Ocean Systems Engineering, v.5, no.3, pp 221 - 243 | - |
dc.citation.title | Ocean Systems Engineering | - |
dc.citation.volume | 5 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 221 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 243 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | floating wind turbine | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | tower | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | blade | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | simplified model | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | FEM | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(34103) 대전광역시 유성구 유성대로1312번길 32042-866-3114
COPYRIGHT 2021 BY KOREA RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SHIPS & OCEAN ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.